| Purpose:
To comply with GAAP, all companies with fiscal years that
start after December 15, 2001, must apply the provisions Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142), which
requires that acquired goodwill no longer be amortized and,
instead, that it be periodically tested for impairment.
SFAS 142 eliminates the amortization of acquired goodwill
and introduces an annual (or in some cases, more frequent)
impairment test. In the first step of the two-step impairment
test, potential impairment is determined by comparing the
fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, including
goodwill. The fair value of a reporting unit is the amount
at which that unit could be bought or sold as a whole in a
current transaction between willing parties, that is, other
than in a forced or liquidation sale. If the carrying value
is greater than fair value, the second step of the goodwill
impairment test must be performed to determine the amount
of the impairment, if any.
The second step is the equivalent of apurchase
price allocation. In a purchase price allocation,
each asset and liability of the reporting unit must be identified
and valued. Guidance for assigning values to assets and liabilities
is provided in SFAS 141. The amount by which the fair value
established in step one exceeds the amount allocated to the
assets and liabilities of a reporting unit is the implied
fair value of goodwill. The excess of the carrying amount
of goodwill over the fair value of that goodwill determines
the amount of the goodwill impairment.
Compliance with SFAS 142 will be of particular concern to
companies with publicly traded stock, because in certain cases
it will cause greater volatility in reported income. The change
will initially cause some businesses to report higher earnings
because they no longer are required to amortize goodwill,
while others will report lower earnings because they will
need to recognize substantial impairment charges.
Who can test and what will it cost? In certain cases, companies
may have the ability to internally prepare their goodwill
impairment tests. These situations, however, will be the exception
to the rule. Lynn E. Turner, former Chief Accountant of the
SEC observed, “Whether it is in conjunction with the
acquisition of a business, the performance of the impairment
test or the evaluation of recorded intangible assets at transition,
in almost every instance, companies will be required to obtain
the assistance of a competent and knowledgeable professional
to assist in the valuation of these intangible assets.”
Cost drivers for valuation services are the size and complexity
of the business, the number of reporting units, the number
and type of identifiable intangibles, and the availability
of information.
|